Summary: The case pertains to a match for declaration and permanent injunction. The defendant presented the plaintiff an oath, which the plaintiff acknowledged, as permitted less than Article 163 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984. However, the defendant challenged the choice, resulting in the acceptance of the appeals and remanding with the satisfies https://simonpvbyo.csublogs.com/38947089/not-known-facts-about-best-agreement-advocate-in-karachi